The photo came into my email last week. A sign posted on the door of an establishment of an American Muslim merchant had a follow-through rant by the poster about how the notice commemorated the hijackers of 9/11. Two initials on the sign, told the real story. It took maybe five seconds for me to put the puzzle together. The photo had nothing to do with 9/11 or anti-West sentiment. It did have everything to do with the growing problem faced across the globe. Internet communication is slowly moving forward as a means to perpetuate unsubstantiated animosity.
I do not belong to any social networks. This blog, is your only window into my life and for the most part I keep the shutters closed. My life is not that interesting. Neither is yours, by the way. But beyond the self-absorptive world of Facebook and "a thousand friends" lies the still uncharted world of societal impact and capabilities of these loosely construed networks to deconstruct societal boundaries.
Layered within the social networks harmless aspects lie the "Champions of Human Liberty". These self-appointed experts are capable of much harm. Such is the nature of the beast with the Facebook shout out to draw Muhammad. I supported the concerted effort by the cartoonists in the Netherlands to print their Prophet Muhammad cartoons several years ago. I still support the effort as one of a professional cadre of political cartoonists reaffirming the obvious: open societies have bequeathed their citizens with generous liberties. That being noted, I do not see the need for the average citizen to trumpet a liberty already secured, and jurisprudentially unassailable in a court of law. I disdain any citizen who has neither shed their blood nor seen the sweat break across their brow when he or she purposefully perpetuates animosity with the click of an internet posting.
The government of Pakistan is bound by their Constitution and their penal code, amongst other things. Article II of the Constitution proclaims Pakistan an Islamic Republic. Section 295 C of the penal code addresses blasphemy against Muhammad. Section 298 A, extends the right of protection against defamation to Muhammad's wives, family members, the Caliphs and even the well known Companions of the Prophet. Below, the text of section 295 C.
"Use of derogatory remarks, etc; in respect of the Holy Prophet. Whoever by words, either spoken or written or by visible representation, or by any imputation, innuendo, or insinuation, directly or indirectly, defiles the sacred name of the Holy Prophet Mohammed (PBUH) shall be punished with death, or imprisonment for life, and shall also be liable to fine."
So how is Pakistan to respond when a liberty embraced by the West creates a public safety issue on the streets of their cities? They do what every government will at some point be forced to do at a future date: deny communication capabilities.
There is an interesting Qur'anic-Hadith linkage which recounts the story of a man who was summoned to speak to Heraclius regarding Muhammad. When he was asked, "Do the nobles follow him or the poor people?" - the response was, "It is the poor who follow him." When further prodded by Heraclius, "Is the number of his followers increasing or decreasing?" - the response was, "They are increasing."
Across the world today a disproportionate number of Muslims remain poverty-stricken. Encumbered with high birth rates there is little chance for dramatic change to the socioeconomic fortunes of many Muslims entering adulthood in this century. Poverty is handcuffed to high illiteracy rates in many Muslim-majority countries. High illiteracy rates create populations which are vulnerable to manipulation which target the emotional response. Undoubtedly many of those hitting the streets in defense of their Prophet are functionally illiterate but they are hyper-passionate regarding an insult to their belief. So while "Drawing Muhammad" may be a fun way to spend your day in the West, it can create societal unrest within nations which are barely hanging onto their stability by their bloody claws. Shame on the individual who felt the need to kick up a bit of dust.
The color of our laws on freedom of expression in the West allow us to draw outside the lines which constrain our neighbors in the Orient. That right will never be taken away from us. It is earned, and it will be here to stay. I can draw a picture of Muhammad and post it on my blog tomorrow. I wouldn't feel a moment of remorse. But neither do I feel the need to appear the champion. My liberty is secure.
Should we color inside a few lines for the sake of our global neighbors? You decide.
*Editorial note: Qur'an/Hadith link available on request.
Tammy Swofford